|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
See also ... |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Stochastic
effects are usually associated with exposures to low levels of radiation
exposure over a long period of time (e.g. years). The term stochastic literally means ‘random’, the
implication being that low levels of radiation exposure are not certain to
produce an effect. The induction of
cancer and genetic defects are two of the most familiar consequences attributed
to stochastic effects. The
description of stochastic effects is subject to a degree of controversy (owing
to the difficulties in separating the effects of low-level radiation exposure
from the effects of other carcinogens, e.g. tobacco smoke, non-radioactive
species, etc), but the currently accepted theories lead to the following
conclusions about stochastic effects:
1. There is no threshold level of radiation exposure below which we can say with certainty that cancer or genetic effects will NOT occur;
Doubling the radiation dose doubles the probability that a cancer or
genetic effect will occur.
Taken
together, radiation experts refer to these two conclusions as the
‘linear-no-threshold’ hypothesis. This
hypothesis is questioned from time to time; however, it provides a pragmatic
means of estimating radiation risks, and is consistent with the (limited) data
that are available.
Deterministic
effects are associated with much higher levels of radiation exposure, usually
incurred over a much shorter period of time (fractions of a second to tens of
days) than is the case for stochastic effects.
As for stochastic effects, deterministic effects have two characteristic
features:
There is a threshold radiation dose, below which the deterministic
effects are not observed; The severity of the deterministic effect increases with the magnitude of the radiation dose
There
are a variety of deterministic effects that can be observed after an acute
exposure to radiation. These
include (in order of increasing severity):
1.
Hemopoietic
syndrome – an
effect related to the effects of radiation on blood-forming tissues, normally
indicated by changes in blood cell counts;
2.
Gastrointestinal syndrome
– an effect signaling the destruction of the gastrointestinal epithelium (the
lining of the gastrointestinal tract);
3.
Central nervous system syndrome
– an effect seen at very high radiation doses in which the central nervous
system undergoes irreparable damage.
The
usual symptoms following an acute radiation dose include nausea, vomiting and
general fatigue. In the case of the
hemopoietic syndrome, medical intervention may be capable of saving the victim.
With the gastrointestinal syndrome, the most likely outcome is death
within several weeks. Anyone
suffering the central nervous syndrome will die within a few hours to a few days
of exposure.
Exposure to high levels of radiation, for example through placing a powerful radiation source next to the skin, can also give rise to some nasty burns and other externally visible symptoms. The following photos illustrate some of these:
The moral of these photographs is that radiation and radioactivity needs proper handling if serious side-effects are to be avoided. Proper handling was certainly not applied in the first two cases.
At
various stages in this discussion, we have referred to ‘levels’ or
‘magnitude’ of radiation dose. Expressing
the size of a radiation dose is most conveniently done by specifying the amount
energy deposited by the incident radiation.
The basic measure of radiation dose is called absorbed dose and is equal to the amount of energy deposited in the
body, divided by the mass of the body volume irradiated.
The unit is the Gray, and one Gray = one joule per kilogram.
One joule is quite a small amount of energy (to heat 1 litre of water by
1 degree Celsius requires 4200 joules of energy), but 1 Gray of radiation dose
is quite a substantial dose (the hemopoietic syndrome sets in after a whole-body
dose of about 2 Gray). This hints
at one of the curious factors about radiation – even high radiation doses
cannot be felt by the human senses, at the time of irradiation.
Other
more sophisticated measures of radiation dose take account of the differing
abilities of the different types of radiation to induce cellular damage (alpha
particles are more effective than beta particles and gamma rays), and the
different sensitivities of different tissues in the body.
Of particular importance is a measure called the Sievert.
The Sievert defines a quantity called effective
dose, which takes into account both of these considerations.
In assessing effective doses, the calculated or measured effective dose is usually compared with dose limits. Dose limits are maximum allowed values, and are prescribed by a body known as the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). For members of the public, the dose limit is 1 mSv/yr (0.001 Sieverts per year), and for occupational workers (workers who work in the nuclear industry), the dose limit is prescribed as 20 mSv/yr (0.02 Sieverts per year). These dose limits exclude the effects of background radiation, as described in the next section.
|
|||||||||||||||||||